In our Oslo to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 2461km route in 27h 20min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 20min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~402 kWh
- Distance: 2461km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 20min |
27h 37min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~443 kWh |
~443 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (12 min, 18% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Europabrücke (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Mantova Village (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Kaufland Center (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Electra Old Wild West (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2461km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~402 kWh vs ~452 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons