In our Rome to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 2458km route in 27h 23min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 23min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~401 kWh
- Distance: 2458km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 23min |
27h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~442 kWh |
~438 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Mantova Village (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Green Deer Bavarian Hotel (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Væggerløsevej (12 min, 16% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (13 min, 15% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Raststätte Kostner (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (11 min, 17% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (14 min, 15% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2458km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~401 kWh vs ~451 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons