In our Oslo to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 84 minutes, completing the 1550km route in 18h 12min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 12min (84 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~241 kWh
- Distance: 1550km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
18h 12min |
19h 36min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
2h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~279 kWh |
~280 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
A.T.U (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Targowa Górka (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rogoziniec (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 84-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1550km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 2h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~241 kWh vs ~244 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons