In our Warsaw to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 80 minutes, completing the 1552km route in 18h 13min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 13min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~242 kWh
- Distance: 1552km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
18h 13min |
19h 33min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
2h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~279 kWh |
~280 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Autohaus König (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Burger King (12 min, 26% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Circle K Onsalamotet (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Walewice (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K Kongevejen (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Importgatan (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 80-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1552km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 2h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~242 kWh vs ~245 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons