In our Warsaw to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 90 minutes, completing the 1586km route in 15h 1min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 1min (90 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1586km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 1min |
16h 31min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
2h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~286 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Remscheid West (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Walewice (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Ehrenberg West (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bierset (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (21 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 90-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1586km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 2h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~250 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons