In our Oslo to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 109 minutes, completing the 2014km route in 23h 0min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 0min (109 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~313 kWh
- Distance: 2014km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
23h 0min |
24h 49min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
2h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~363 kWh |
~363 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 22% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Max-Plank-Straße (11 min, 12% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Trieben (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Nordhøj (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (13 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's - Autohof Brück (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
ATU (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Stern-Center (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Raststation Kammern (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 109-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2014km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 2h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~313 kWh vs ~317 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons