In our Zagreb to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 108 minutes, completing the 2008km route in 22h 57min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 57min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~313 kWh
- Distance: 2008km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
22h 57min |
24h 45min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
2h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~361 kWh |
~362 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Donautal Ost (14 min, 19% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Farø (17 min, 14% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (11 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Tankstelle Bergler (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Hecht Einrichtungen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Autohof (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Burger King (14 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Circle K Kongevejen (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 13:
Tradenvägen (20 min, 12% → 69%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2008km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 2h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~313 kWh vs ~316 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons