In our Prague to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 123 minutes, completing the 1995km route in 20h 6min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 6min (123 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~310 kWh
- Distance: 1995km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 6min |
22h 9min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
3h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~359 kWh |
~360 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tópark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol A1 (19 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Skotina dir Athen (24 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 23% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (27 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV smer Beograd (42 min, 10% → 98%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Atalanti Süd (11 min, 19% → 53%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 123-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1995km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 3h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~310 kWh vs ~314 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons