In our Prague to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 100 minutes, completing the 1677km route in 21h 47min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 47min (100 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 59min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1677km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 47min |
23h 27min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
2h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~304 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Autogala Volvo (19 min, 24% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 19% → 59%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Citronex (23 min, 22% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Rimi Niidu (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Neste Pääsküla (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 100-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1677km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 59min vs 2h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~264 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons