In our Prague to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 12 minutes, completing the 2210km route in 21h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 59min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~361 kWh
- Distance: 2210km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 59min |
22h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
1h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~398 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ATU (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Zone de trois Couronnes (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Super U (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (10 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Frankenhöhe Nord (10 min, 27% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Recharge Autohof Ettenheim-West (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Besançon Champoux (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire des Volcans d'Auvergne Ouest (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Super U (15 min, 14% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 12-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2210km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 1h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~361 kWh vs ~406 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons