In our Prague to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 96 minutes, completing the 1589km route in 18h 46min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 46min (96 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1589km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
18h 46min |
20h 22min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~286 kWh |
~288 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Autogala Volvo (19 min, 24% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste (14 min, 15% → 71%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Citronex (23 min, 22% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Guzew Południe (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Fabryczna (30 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste Niidu (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 96-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1589km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 2h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~250 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons