In our Riga to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 19 minutes, completing the 1712km route in 20h 23min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 23min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 9min
- Energy: ~279 kWh
- Distance: 1712km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 23min |
20h 42min |
| Charging time: |
1h 9min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~308 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (16 min, 10% → 73%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 14% → 45%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 19-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1712km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 9min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~279 kWh vs ~314 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons