In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 43 minutes, completing the 1802km route in 25h 53min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 53min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 53min |
26h 36min |
| Charging time: |
2h 7min |
2h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~324 kWh |
~324 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (30 min, 31% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
Revia Park (33 min, 15% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (21 min, 22% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (14 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (41 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (26 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (38 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 2h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~331 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons