In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 18 minutes, completing the 1484km route in 15h 23min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 15h 23min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~258 kWh
- Distance: 1484km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
15h 41min |
15h 23min |
| Charging time: |
1h 41min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~267 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (10 min, 30% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Campogalliano Est (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Paganella Est (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofer (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Frankenwald Ost (11 min, 15% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Autohof Bitterfeld (12 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (12 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Paganella Est (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Langenbruck A9 (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (18 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 18-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1484km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 1h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~258 kWh vs ~259 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons