In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 31 minutes, completing the 1925km route in 20h 50min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 20h 50min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 4min
- Energy: ~335 kWh
- Distance: 1925km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
21h 21min |
20h 50min |
| Charging time: |
2h 28min |
2h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~347 kWh |
~346 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (21 min, 26% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Sant'Ilario Nord (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Castellaro Nord (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Bréguières Nord (14 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Lançon de Provence Est (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Gigean Nord (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
ANDGO (22 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Vila Sana (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Restaurante Cafeteria Valdeherrera (20 min, 18% → 78%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (15 min, 33% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (14 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (28 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Ariza Norte (16 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1925km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 4min vs 2h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~335 kWh vs ~336 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons