In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 49 minutes, completing the 1862km route in 22h 45min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 22h 45min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 58min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 1862km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
23h 34min |
22h 45min |
| Charging time: |
2h 59min |
2h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~337 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (13 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Barje Jug (12 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 16% → 79%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (28 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (44 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (13 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (12 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 4:
Petrol (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (27 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (32 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (74 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 49-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1862km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 58min vs 2h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~325 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons