In our Rome to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 1452km route in 14h 56min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 56min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~226 kWh
- Distance: 1452km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 56min |
15h 7min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~261 kWh |
~261 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Coop Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY B'Fun Park (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Centro Shopping Serfontana (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Sonnenberg Ost (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Keskastel Est (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Shopping Cora (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1452km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~226 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons