In our Rome to London EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 50 by 154 minutes, completing the 1761km route in 19h 7min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 7min (154 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~323 kWh
- Distance: 1761km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron 50 |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 41min |
19h 7min |
| Charging time: |
3h 33min |
1h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~316 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron 50 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Arezzo Park Hotel (19 min, 16% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (20 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Lario Est (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Mühlematt Ost (21 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rue de la Madeleine (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Toul Dommartin (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de Champ Roland (27 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Channel Gateway (13 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: London
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Centro Shopping Serfontana (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Toul Dommartin (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 154-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 50 on this 1761km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 3h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~323 kWh vs ~426 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons