In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 50 by 164 minutes, completing the 1929km route in 20h 2min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 2min (164 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~354 kWh
- Distance: 1929km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron 50 |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 46min |
20h 2min |
| Charging time: |
3h 48min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
14 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~347 kWh |
~346 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron 50 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Badia al Pino Est (14 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (23 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Sant'Ilario Nord (19 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Castellaro Nord (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Rousset (19 min, 13% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Nabrigas (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Gasparets (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
ANDGO (18 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Vila Sana (23 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 12:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 13:
Zunder Avia (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 14:
Supercharger Estación de Servicio Repsol (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
ANDGO (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 164-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 50 on this 1929km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 3h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~354 kWh vs ~466 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons