In our Rome to Milan EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 18 minutes, completing the 573km route in 5h 28min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 5h 28min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~105 kWh
- Distance: 573km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
5h 28min |
5h 46min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
25min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~103 kWh |
~104 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est, Casalecchio di Reno (10 min, 23% → 63%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Est, Modena (15 min, 11% → 58%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 18-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 573km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons