In our Rome to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 117 minutes, completing the 1653km route in 16h 41min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 41min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~257 kWh
- Distance: 1653km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 41min |
18h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
2h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (15 min, 21% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (17 min, 24% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Nord Est Mall (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Dul Jug (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (39 min, 10% → 99%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Textile House Bulevar maršala Tolbuhina (25 min, 16% → 81%)
-
Stop 8:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (19 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 117-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1653km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 2h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~257 kWh vs ~260 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons