In our Rome to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 12 minutes, completing the 1090km route in 10h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 48min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~170 kWh
- Distance: 1090km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
10h 48min |
11h 0min |
| Charging time: |
25min |
33min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~196 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (12 min, 22% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Billa Töschling (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 18% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 18% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 12-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1090km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~170 kWh vs ~200 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons