In our Rome to Vienna EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 36 minutes, completing the 1092km route in 11h 0min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 0min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 1092km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 0min |
11h 36min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
1h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~197 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 18% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 18% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 15% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Fella Est (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (10 min, 14% → 50%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 36-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1092km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 1h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons