In our Rome to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 32 minutes, completing the 2261km route in 22h 59min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 59min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~352 kWh
- Distance: 2261km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 59min |
23h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~407 kWh |
~406 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 22% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (11 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 18% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AMIGO (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2261km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~352 kWh vs ~415 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons