In our Sofia to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 60 minutes, completing the 1445km route in 16h 29min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 29min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~225 kWh
- Distance: 1445km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 29min |
17h 29min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
2h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~260 kWh |
~286 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 37% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (16 min, 49% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (36 min, 10% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Signalbau (14 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Orlen Wieszowa Południe (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1445km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 2h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~225 kWh vs ~228 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons