In our Tallinn to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 50 minutes, completing the 2114km route in 30h 11min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 11min (50 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 23min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2114km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
30h 11min |
31h 1min |
| Charging time: |
2h 23min |
2h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~381 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (36 min, 17% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Revia Park (33 min, 15% → 85%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (16 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 4:
Bistro Osmolice (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (41 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 6:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (26 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Sucedava (38 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 50-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2114km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 23min vs 2h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~388 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons