In our Vienna to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 124 minutes, completing the 1709km route in 17h 31min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 31min (124 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~266 kWh
- Distance: 1709km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 31min |
19h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
2h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~308 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 52% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (24 min, 23% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol A1 (19 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Skotina dir Athen (24 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (20 min, 17% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (18 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Gazprom (26 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Skotina dir Athen (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Atalanti Süd (11 min, 19% → 53%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 124-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1709km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 2h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~266 kWh vs ~272 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons