In our Athens to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 119 minutes, completing the 1697km route in 17h 18min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 18min (119 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~264 kWh
- Distance: 1697km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 18min |
19h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
2h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~305 kWh |
~309 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 29% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (28 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Zemun Park (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (15 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (26 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Ledi MS (39 min, 21% → 89%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 119-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1697km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 2h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~264 kWh vs ~270 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons