In our Vienna to Milan EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 15 minutes, completing the 828km route in 8h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 8h 59min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~130 kWh
- Distance: 828km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 14min |
8h 59min |
| Charging time: |
1h 6min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle, Neumarkt in der Steiermark (10 min, 21% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus, Villach (10 min, 17% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledra Ovest, Colloredo di Monte Albano (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Eurospar, Gruaro (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Ricarica Limenella Nord, Limena (13 min, 12% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord, Desenzano del Garda (13 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle, Pöckstein-Zwischenwässern (12 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia, Amaro (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Be Charge Bazzera Nord, Venezia (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Italiana Petroli Monte Alto Nord, Desenzano del Garda (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 15-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 828km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~130 kWh vs ~140 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons