In our Vilnius to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 99 minutes, completing the 1689km route in 16h 37min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 37min (99 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 49min
- Energy: ~263 kWh
- Distance: 1689km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 37min |
18h 16min |
| Charging time: |
49min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~304 kWh |
~305 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Skarboszewo (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (16 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 30% → 92%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Osiecza (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen A2 MOP Gnilec (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
A.T.U (11 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 11:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 99-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1689km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 49min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~263 kWh vs ~266 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons