In our Vilnius to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 16 minutes, completing the 1256km route in 24h 54min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 54min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~195 kWh
- Distance: 1256km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 54min |
25h 10min |
| Charging time: |
1h 10min |
2h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~226 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Talsu iela (50 min, 23% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (26 min, 19% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Krauz Oil (13 min, 16% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
OTO Park Handlowy (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Nowokarsiborska (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 6:
OKQ8 Hedvägen (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Snapparp Östra (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Importgatan (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 16-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1256km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 10min vs 2h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~195 kWh vs ~198 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons