In our Vilnius to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 2088km route in 20h 23min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 23min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~341 kWh
- Distance: 2088km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 23min |
20h 36min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~376 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pas Lado (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Skarboszewo (12 min, 12% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Remscheid West (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Skarboszewo (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (12 min, 20% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2088km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~341 kWh vs ~383 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons