In our Zagreb to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 20 minutes, completing the 2075km route in 25h 39min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 39min (20 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~339 kWh
- Distance: 2075km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 39min |
25h 59min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~374 kWh |
~374 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 16% → 57%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle Breitenleer Straße West (11 min, 24% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 11% → 64%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 20-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2075km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~339 kWh vs ~381 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons