In our Zagreb to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 1525km route in 16h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 3min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~249 kWh
- Distance: 1525km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 3min |
16h 14min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~275 kWh |
~274 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle Breitenleer Straße West (11 min, 24% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1525km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~249 kWh vs ~280 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons