In our Zürich to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 11 minutes, completing the 823km route in 9h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 0min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~131 kWh
- Distance: 823km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 11min |
9h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~148 kWh |
~148 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Zürich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Netto (18 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Frankenwald Ost (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Greenline Tankstelle Oberkaka (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Autohof (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Zürich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ellwanger Berge Ost (12 min, 14% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Hecht Einrichtungen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 11-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 823km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~131 kWh vs ~139 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons