In our Zürich to Milan EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 9 minutes, completing the 280km route in 3h 8min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 0 charging stops compared to 1 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 3h 8min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 0
- Charging time: 0min
- Energy: ~45 kWh
- Distance: 280km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
3h 17min |
3h 8min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
0min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
0 |
| Energy used |
~50 kWh |
~50 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Zürich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Gurtnellen, Gurtnellen (10 min, 68% → 79%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Zürich (100% charge)
- Charging stop details available in interactive view below
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 9-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 280km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 0 stops vs 1 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 0min vs 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~45 kWh vs ~47 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons