In our Berlin to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 7 minutes, completing the 663km route in 7h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 7h 3min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~105 kWh
- Distance: 663km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 10min |
7h 3min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
36min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~119 kWh |
~119 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MoBi-Punkt Liststraße (10 min, 39% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Kardausova DC (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (11 min, 16% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 7-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 663km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~105 kWh vs ~112 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons