In our Berlin to Riga EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 30 minutes, completing the 1054km route in 14h 17min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 14h 17min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~168 kWh
- Distance: 1054km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 47min |
14h 17min |
| Charging time: |
2h 4min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~190 kWh |
~190 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Jarkowo Południe (10 min, 21% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Armii Krajowej (15 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Krauz Oil (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka (58 min, 12% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Vilniaus (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Girelė (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Jarkowo Południe (10 min, 26% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Szafranka (17 min, 12% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka (38 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 4:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 30-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1054km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 2h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~168 kWh vs ~179 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons