In our Berlin to Vilnius EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 27 minutes, completing the 1060km route in 11h 52min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 11h 52min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 35min
- Energy: ~169 kWh
- Distance: 1060km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 19min |
11h 52min |
| Charging time: |
1h 55min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~191 kWh |
~191 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 18% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Lądek (13 min, 17% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Orlen Lazurowa (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland (34 min, 10% → 80%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 23% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (13 min, 21% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Mogiły (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (31 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 27-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1060km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 35min vs 1h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~169 kWh vs ~180 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons