In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 198 minutes, completing the 1952km route in 21h 55min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 55min (198 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1952km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 55min |
25h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
3h 18min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~357 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Autohof (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Autohof Bitterfeld (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Boschstraße (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE (26 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Gulf Autohof (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Rossmann Graniczna (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Żwirki i Wigury (28 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 8:
Lidl (36 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Vilniaus (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Stokker (13 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 198-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1952km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 3h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~310 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons