In our Bern to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 72 minutes, completing the 1403km route in 14h 11min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 11min (72 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~218 kWh
- Distance: 1403km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 11min |
15h 23min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~253 kWh |
~253 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (10 min, 24% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Auerswalder Blick Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
mblty Agip Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
BFS Business Fleet Services (12 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Vogtland Süd (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Schnellladepark (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Michałowice Południe (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Guzew Południe (15 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 72-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1403km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~218 kWh vs ~223 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons