In our Bratislava to Amsterdam EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 1182km route in 13h 1min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 1min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 32min
- Energy: ~188 kWh
- Distance: 1182km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 18min |
13h 1min |
| Charging time: |
1h 42min |
1h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~213 kWh |
~212 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 16% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Autosalon Klokočka (17 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Gablenz-Center (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Autohof Holzland (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Laucha (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Am Fieseler Werk (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Autohof Geseke (10 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Schmalkalder Straße (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Recharge De Schaars (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
E.ON Naháč (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Zschopauer Straße (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Laucha (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Autohof Elsinger Höhe (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Werler Straße (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Helderloh (15 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1182km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 32min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~188 kWh vs ~200 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons