In our Bratislava to Athens EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 41 minutes, completing the 1669km route in 19h 2min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 19h 2min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 51min
- Energy: ~265 kWh
- Distance: 1669km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 43min |
19h 2min |
| Charging time: |
3h 26min |
2h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (23 min, 25% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (23 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Gazprom (32 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (26 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (21 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol (18 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Skotina dir Athen (29 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Atalanti Süd (14 min, 17% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (30 min, 14% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (19 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Gazprom (26 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Skotina dir Athen (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Atalanti Süd (11 min, 19% → 53%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 41-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1669km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 51min vs 3h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~265 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons