In our Budapest to Berlin EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 3680 minutes, completing the 861km route in 8h 55min. The key advantage? 15 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 18 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170
- Total time: 8h 55min (3680 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~150 kWh
- Distance: 861km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
70h 15min |
8h 55min |
| Charging time: |
61h 29min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
18 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~155 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
M1 Igmandi Piheno - Györ (158 min, 13% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Arrabona pihenõ északi (208 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Mosonmagyaróvár Nord (204 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Lidl (226 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation (244 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
MOL Zeleňák - Brno (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 7:
ZDAR (240 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
MOL Mikulášov sever (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 9:
PRE Naháč (104 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 10:
Renocar (22 min, 10% → 15%)
-
Stop 11:
Norma Uhříněves (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 12:
Redoil (145 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 13:
Varvažov jih (254 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 14:
Sarrasaniparkplatz (131 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 15:
Gewerbepark (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 16:
Spreewalddreieck (362 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 17:
Jeanette-Wolff-Straße (31 min, 10% → 16%)
-
Stop 18:
Möwenweg (54 min, 10% → 22%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ladná směr Brno (13 min, 18% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (21 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Hansastraße (16 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 achieved a 3680-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 861km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 18 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 61h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~150 kWh vs ~278 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons