In our Helsinki to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 46 minutes, completing the 2193km route in 33h 11min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 33h 11min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 26min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 2193km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
33h 11min |
33h 57min |
| Charging time: |
2h 26min |
2h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~395 kWh |
~396 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (13 min, 14% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Główna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Revia Park (33 min, 14% → 85%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 41% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (25 min, 13% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 5:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (14 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (41 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 7:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (26 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Sucedava (38 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2193km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 26min vs 2h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~403 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons