In our Helsinki to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 49 minutes, completing the 2477km route in 30h 14min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 14min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 48min
- Energy: ~404 kWh
- Distance: 2477km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
30h 14min |
31h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 48min |
2h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~446 kWh |
~446 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (35 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Remscheid West (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K (76 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (11 min, 24% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 49-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2477km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 48min vs 2h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~404 kWh vs ~455 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons