In our Helsinki to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 36 minutes, completing the 2506km route in 31h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 31h 57min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 3min
- Energy: ~409 kWh
- Distance: 2506km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
31h 57min |
32h 33min |
| Charging time: |
2h 3min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~451 kWh |
~453 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (25 min, 14% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (28 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 41% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (23 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (19 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 36-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2506km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 3min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~409 kWh vs ~460 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons