In our London to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 84 minutes, completing the 1541km route in 15h 57min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 57min (84 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~240 kWh
- Distance: 1541km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 57min |
17h 21min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~277 kWh |
~278 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tienbaan (11 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 22% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (14 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tienbaan (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
E.ON Weiskirchen Süd (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Mer McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
EnBW Rastpark24 (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (13 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 84-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1541km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~240 kWh vs ~245 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons