In our Milan to Paris EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 3501 minutes, completing the 817km route in 9h 10min. The key advantage? 10 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170
- Total time: 9h 10min (3501 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~143 kWh
- Distance: 817km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
67h 31min |
9h 10min |
| Charging time: |
57h 44min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
14 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~147 kWh |
~153 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via Riva (77 min, 58% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Oratorio San Nicola (353 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (340 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
P+R Vennes (190 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Parking de la Gare (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 7:
Super U (240 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Aire de Pont Val de Saône (335 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 9:
Mobilize Lounge Avia (249 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Maison Dieu (217 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (213 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de la Couline (231 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Aire de Darvault (353 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 14:
Total Avenue de la Porte d'Italie (22 min, 10% → 15%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tunnel du Mont Blanc (10 min, 31% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (14 min, 21% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Ambreuil (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (15 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 achieved a 3501-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 817km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 57h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~143 kWh vs ~264 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons