In our Milan to Brussels EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 3660 minutes, completing the 853km route in 9h 51min. The key advantage? 12 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 16 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170
- Total time: 9h 51min (3660 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~149 kWh
- Distance: 853km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
70h 51min |
9h 51min |
| Charging time: |
60h 32min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
16 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~157 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Casa Comunale (68 min, 43% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Bellinzona Sud (263 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Autobahnraststätte Stalvedro (340 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
Allmendhüsli (122 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
CKW Raststätte Neuenkirch Ost (276 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Mühlematt Ost (117 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 7:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
Parking Mairie (195 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Super U et Drive (308 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 10:
E. Leclerc (331 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 11:
P+R Foire Expo (344 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 12:
Lidl (249 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 13:
Lidl (222 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 14:
Wanlin Ost (358 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 15:
Carrefour (113 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 16:
De Warande (13 min, 10% → 13%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (10 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Sonnenberg Ost (11 min, 42% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Keskastel Est (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shopping Cora (17 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 achieved a 3660-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 853km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 16 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 60h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~149 kWh vs ~275 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons